CNN provides a comprehensive survey about the state of tourism in iconic places, from Machu Picchu to Dubrovnik, and all the way to Venice, “perhaps the destination most commonly associated with tourism overflow. “In each of the other places, officials were also interviewed about policies and new plans, while the lack of governance in Venice is evident. Here are excerpts from Jane da Mosto’s responses to CNN, which would have been too long for the final story: “I hate the word tourism, it has many negative connotations. In the future, I hope that Venice, collectively, will return to considering the people who come here as visitors. Think about how we behave when we visit a friend. The friend cares about making your visit enjoyable and you, likewise, behave in a way that is appropriate to the context in which your friend places you. There is enormous potential for Venice in the quality of its offerings: delicious and distinctive foods from the lagoon and the Adriatic region, extraordinary crafts and artisans, cultural experiences from major international events such as the Biennale, to the opportunity to appreciate humanity through the extraordinary history and art of Venice, and so many wonderful outdoor experiences exploring the islands of the lagoon, swimming in the sea at the Lido, walking endlessly through the historic city…” “It is increasingly difficult to predict when the pandemic will be under control and what the state of the global economy will be by that time. What is certain is that very specific and concrete policy decisions are needed, involving investments, incentives and stricter regulations to support a long-term vision of what is best for Venice. In recent times, Venice and Venetians have had to passively resist the effects of a tourism industry that was driven by what was best for globalized corporations and speculative investments – not necessarily or particularly sensitive to what is best for the traveler.”